Legal Opinion

Crane v. Citicorp National Services, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 23, 1993No. 23926PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

The issues presented in this appeal are whether a co-obligator of a debt secured by consumer goods without title or right to possession of the goods can (1) recover in conversion against the creditor’s wrongful repossession under the South Carolina Consumer Protection Code, or (2) recover under the statutory penalty provided in the Uniform Commercial Code for the creditor’s failure to provide notice of the sale of the collateral.

FACTS

The Cranes purchased a mobile home on an installment sales contract and security agreement. The contract was immediately assigned to Citicorp by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rhoten v. United Virginia BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  2. Buran Equipment Co. v. H & C INVESTMENT CO.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Oxford Finance Companies, Inc. v. BurgessSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Powell v. A. K. Brown Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1942

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Regions Bank v. SchmauchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  2. Brockbank v. Best Capital Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Nucor Corp. v. BellDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2007
  4. Hawkins v. City of GreenvilleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Moore v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API