Legal Opinion

Oxford Finance Companies, Inc. v. Burgess

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 4, 1991No. 23329PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

This appeal involves whether a landlord has priority to possession of a mobile home over a purchase money security interest holder. The circuit court held the purchase money in terest holder was entitled to possession of the mobile home. We affirm.

FACTS

On November 13, 1986, Lawrence Pruitt and Kelly Pruitt (Tenants) entered into a lease with Robert A. Burgess (Landlord) to rent a lot upon which to place a mobile home. The lease requires a payment of $85.00 per month, is silent as to its term, and requires thirty (30) days notice by the Tenants for its termination.

On November 15,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Castell v. Stephenson Finance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  2. Causey v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Taylor v. MurphySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  4. Burnett v. BoukedesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  5. Hunt v. JordanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Moore v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  2. Crane v. Citicorp National Services, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Guill v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1999
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. S.B. Phillips Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
  5. MacKela v. BentleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API