Legal Opinion
Brockbank v. Best Capital Corp.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 29, 2000No. 25162PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLER, Justice:
Edward P. Brockbank (Debtor) sued Best Capital Corp. (Creditor) after the repossession and sale of his mobile home, alleging, among other things, violation of the notice provision contained in Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). 1 The trial judge granted Creditor’s motion for summary judgment. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded. Brockbank v. Best Capital Corp., Op. No. 99-UP-098 (S.C.Ct.App. filed February 18, 1999). We granted Creditor’s petition for a writ of certiorari following the denial by the Court of Appeals of Creditor’s petition for rehearing. We…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Tupper v. Dorchester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. Stewart, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
- In the Matter of Amex-Protein Development Corporation, Bankrupt. M. Nolden, Trustee of Estate of Bankrupt v. Plant ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Mitchell v. Shepherd Mall State BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Wells v. City of LynchburgCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- George v. FabriSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Bayle v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Lanham v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of South Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Quail Hill, LLC v. County of RichlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Ellis v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.