Legal Opinion

In re Nagoda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 4, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1986. He is employed as an attorney in Kingston, Ulster County. Until May 1996, he maintained a law office in his home in Forestburgh, Sullivan County.

Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, moves for an order pursuant to section 806.4 (b) of this Court’s rules (22 NYCRR 806.4 [b]) suspending respondent from practice pending his compliance with a subpoena duces tecum dated November 18, 1996. Respondent did appear for an examination under oath before petitioner on December 19, 1996, pursuant to the subpoena, but he has not yet…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. In re LyonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re NagodaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re WojcikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re NagodaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. In re NagodaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API