Legal Opinion

In re Wojcik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 3, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1974 and maintains a business address in Cropseyville, Rensselaer County.

Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, moves to suspend respondent from practice pending his full compliance with a subpoena duces tecum served upon him in furtherance of its investigation into his conduct as an attorney (see, 22 NYCRR 806.4 [b], [e]). Respondent appeared at an examination before petitioner pursuant to the subpoena but has failed to produce all of the subpoenaed documentation and has also failed to respond to petitioner’s motion. Under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. In re NagodaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re CannonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. In re DruckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API