Legal Opinion

In re Roberts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 8, 1996PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice in 1971 by the Appellate *802Division, Second Department. He maintains an office for the practice of law in Amsterdam.

Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, moves for an order pursuant to section 806.4 (b) of this Court’s rules (22 NYCRR 806.4 [b]) suspending respondent from practice pending his compliance with a subpoena duces tecum dated July 6, 1995. Respondent produced documentation and appeared at an examination pursuant to the subpoena. Petitioner pursued its investigation by conducting an audit of respondent’s accounts and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re LyonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re NagodaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. In re FarringtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. In re WojcikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. In re CannonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API