In re Nagoda

By decision dated April 4, 1997, respondent was suspended from practice pending his compliance with a subpoena duces tecum issued pursuant to section 806.4 (e) (22 NYCRR 806.4 [e]) of this Court’s rules (Matter of Nagoda, 238 AD2d 667). Respondent now moves to vacate the suspension and for reinstatement to practice on the ground that he has fully complied with the subpoena. Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, moves to suspend respondent from practice pending consideration of disciplinary charges against him (see, 22 NYCRR 806.4 [f]).

Petitioner acknowledges respondent’s…