Legal Opinion

Stuart v. Chaney

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 30, 1925No. 11,124Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion per Curiam.

This is a bill by Murray, Chaney and Baldwin against Stuart to require the trustees, Stuart and Murray, as surviving directors of a defunct corporation, to perform their duty to dispose of the corporate properties and distribute the net proceeds. When we formerly had this case before us, we stated that this must be done. Stuart v. Chaney, 71 Colo. 279, 206 Pac. 386. It does not appear from the abstract of record what has been done to this end, but it does appear that an accounting has been had of the transactions of the trustees since the expiration of the corporation, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rifle Potato Growers Co-Operative Ass'n v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  2. Empson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  3. Stuart v. MurraySupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  4. Stuart v. ChaneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API