Stuart v. Murray
Supreme Court of Colorado
Action for dissolution of partnership and accounting. Finding that the partnership had been dissolved, and judgment for defendant. Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Henry J. Hersey, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
*450The parties to this litigation were for many years partners engaged in the practice of law. In the summer of 1913 the plaintiff in error went to Honolulu, Hawaii, as he says, for a needed rest. On December 5, 1914, he was áppointed a judge of the district court at Honolulu, and held that office for two years. The defendant in error continued in the practice of.the law, and this suit was brought by plaintiff in error for an accounting, and a dissolution of the partnership. Defendant answered traversing many of the allegations of plaintiff’s complaint, and added a counterclaim for…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Justice v. LairyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
4Cited by2 opinions
- Rothrock v. HamlinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
- Stuart v. ChaneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1925