Legal Opinion

Stuart v. Chaney

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 3, 1922No. 9973PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action for sale, and distribution of proceeds of a trust estate. Demurrers to complaint and cross-complaint, sustained. Error to the District Court of Boulder County, Hon. Neil F. Graham, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

*280Stuart and Murray are the surviving directors of a corporation whose charter expired when they and one Miller were directors. Miller has since died, thus they, under the statute, are trustees of the corporate estate. Murray and other persons who are stockholders brought suit against Stuart, alleging that the property could not be divided, asking for partition, for sale and distribution of the proceeds. Stuart filed a cross-bill, setting up the same facts and added that Murray had converted certain money and property of the company and was otherwise indebted to it, and that by reason thereof…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clews v. JamiesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Deutsch v. BaxterColorado Court of Appeals · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stuart v. ChaneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API