Legal Opinion
Helleren v. Dixon
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 22, 1949No. 31694PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaft, J.
The first question to be considered is whether the trial court erred in refusing to’ grant the motion of defendant for a directed verdict.
It is conceded that defendant’s liability is governed by Section 6308-6, General Code. That section reads:
“The owner, operator or person responsible for the operation of a motor vehicle shall not be liable for loss or damage arising from injuries to or death of a guest while being transported without payment therefor in or upon said motor vehicle, resulting from the operation thereof, unless such injuries or death are caused by the wilful or wanton…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tighe v. DiamondOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- Universal Concrete Pipe Co. v. BassettOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- Masters v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
- Jenkins v. SharpOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- Pengelly v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Hawkins v. IvyOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Osler v. City of LorainOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Ranells v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Thornsbury v. ThornsburyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
- American Fidelity & Casualty Company, Inc. v. Indemnity Insurance Company Of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.