Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Doan

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1911No. 7,166PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Prom Putnam Circuit Court; John M. Bawley, Judge. Action by Joseph J. Doan against the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Eailway Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

— Action by appellee against appellant to recover damages for alleged trespass. The complaint is in two paragraphs. In the first paragraph appellee alleges that appellant is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Indiana, and for many years has owned and operated a line of railroad from the city of Indianapolis, Indiana, to the city of St. Louis, Missouri; that he is the owner of a farm of 200 acres, situate in Hendricks county, Indiana, subject to an easement in favor of appellant, said easement being in a strip of land seventy-five feet wide and thirteen hundred eighty feet…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GeiselIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Zimmerman v. GaumerIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Quick v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Chicago & Indiana Coal Railway Co. v. HunterIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Prather v. Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Macy Elevator, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Howard v. United StatesIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HadleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Hoffman v. ZollmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GriswoldIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API