Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Griswold

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 1912No. 7,503PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From Hendricks Circuit Court; J. L. Clark, Judge. Action by James T. Griswold against The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHottel, J.

— This action was instituted by appellee against appellant, to recover damages on account of a trespass on the lands o£ appellee in changing the grade of a track on the old right of way of appellant across the lands of appellee, and involving the destruction of a subway and drainage system on said lands.

The complaint was in four paragraphs, a demurrer to each of which was overruled, and exception saved by appellant. The only answer was a general denial.

The ease was tried before a jury, which found for appellee in the sum of $5,000. Answers to interrogatories were filed with the verdict, and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  3. New Jersey, Indiana & Illinois Railroad v. TuttIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Karmuller v. KrotzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  5. Richmond v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Brown v. HeidersbachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Gene B. Glick Co., Inc. v. Marion Construction Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Klotz v. HornIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Vandalia Railroad v. YeagerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Consolidation Coal Co. v. MutchmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API