Legal Opinion
Rico Import Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 27, 1992No. Court 91-01-00070PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CARMAN, Judge:
The subject merchandise, known as Arundo Donax tubes, were imported by Plaintiff, Rico Import Co., and liquidated by the United States Customs Service at the rate of duty of 3 percent ad valorem under subheading 4602.10.50, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (1990) (“HTSUS”), as an article made directly to shape from other vegetable plaiting materials. Plaintiff protested the liquidations, claiming that the Arundo Donax tubes were properly classifiable free of duty under subheading 1404.90.00, HTSUS, as “[vjegetable products not elsewhere specified…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- United States v. CitroenSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Nippon Kogaku (USA), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Digital Equipment Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bausch & Lomb, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Rico Import Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Pfaff American Sales Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992