United States v. Winter
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 320S5 (T. D. 33362).
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge
The merchandise the subject of controversy in this case is reported by the appraiser to consist of- round reeds manufactured from rattan, *523measuring less than 7 millimeters in diameter. The testimony introduced in the record shows that the merchandise in its present form is properly designated as a reed, and counsel for the Government concedes that it should be so treated on the strength of earlier decisions relating to this class of merchandise. The finding of the board is that it is the crudest form of reed imported, and this finding is fully sustained by the testimony. It is, as reported,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Foppes v. MagoneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1889
- Foppes v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1894
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rico Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- Rattan & Cane Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Graser-Rothe v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- Peabody & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
- United States v. Gerdau Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.