Legal Opinion

United States v. Winter

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 28, 1913No. 1206PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 320S5 (T. D. 33362).

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

The merchandise the subject of controversy in this case is reported by the appraiser to consist of- round reeds manufactured from rattan, *523measuring less than 7 millimeters in diameter. The testimony introduced in the record shows that the merchandise in its present form is properly designated as a reed, and counsel for the Government concedes that it should be so treated on the strength of earlier decisions relating to this class of merchandise. The finding of the board is that it is the crudest form of reed imported, and this finding is fully sustained by the testimony. It is, as reported,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Foppes v. MagoneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1889
  2. Foppes v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1894

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rico Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. Rattan & Cane Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  3. Graser-Rothe v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  4. Peabody & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  5. United States v. Gerdau Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API