Legal Opinion

Crutchfield v. . Foster

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 14, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaenhill, J.

The defendant alleges and contends that the judgment pleaded by him under which his land was sold by the sheriff and purchased by the plaintiff is an attempt to impose a lien on his property for the security of an attorney’s fee and is a nullity. No issues were submitted to a jury. The cause was apparently disposed of by the court below as upon a motion for judgment upon the pleadings, which admits the matters set up in defense, but challenges the sufficiency thereof to bar plaintiff’s recovery. Barnes v. Trust Co., 194 N. C., 371, 139 S. E., 689; Pridgen v. Pridgen, 190 N. C., 102, 129 S.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Stringfield v. HirschTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Casket Co. v. . WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. Pridgen v. . PridgenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Mordecai v. DevereuxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Casket Co. v. . WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Mordecai v. . DevereuxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API