Stringfield v. Hirsch
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Davidson County. J. A. Cartwright, Sp. Ch.
1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.
On July 3,. 1891, attachments were separately sued out in the Chancery Court of Davidson County by Jonas & Co., Lowenheim and Pe-tri, creditors of I. Mihalovitch, and levied on a stock of goods as the property of .1. Mihalovitch, *427& resident of Cincinnati, 0., but in possession of his son-in-law, Joseph Hirsch, in the city of Nashville. The Clerk and Master was appointed receiver, .and took charge of the goods attached, and sold them, under the orders of the Court, on July 27, 1891, for §10,000, the sale being confirmed July SI, 1891, by the Court. After the property had thus been attached as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Day v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Oelrichs v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Arcambel v. WisemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1796
- Teese v. HuntingdonSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
3Cited by26 opinions
- Pinney v. TarpleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
- Guess v. MauryCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
- John J. Heirigs Const. Co., Inc. v. ExideCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
- Goings v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
- B. F. Myers & Son of Goodlettsville, Inc. v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.