Legal Opinion

Crawfordsville & Southwestern Turnpike Co. v. Fletcher

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1885No. 12,206PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellee’s complaint alleges that the appellant is a gravel road company, formed by a consolidation of the Crawfordsville and Alamo Turnpike Company and the Crawfordsville and Parkersburg Gravel Road Company,, and that the consolidation was effected in 1878. The lines of the consolidating companies are described, and it is averred that “ The defendant’s road has been suffered to get and re*99main out of repair, so as to be inconvenient for the public travel for the space of six months and more last passed; that said road is not being repaired; that plaintiff has no good reason to believe…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Humphries v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. City of Logansport v. DickIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Jackson School Township v. FarlowIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. McMahan v. MorrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Shoemaker v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. State v. MorganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Allopathic State Board of Medical Examiners v. FowlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BackusIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Board of Commissioners v. GwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API