Legal Opinion
State v. Lohse
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 25, 2018No. 2 CA-CR 2017-0244PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ECKERSTROM, Chief Judge:
¶ 1 Cody Lohse appeals from his convictions and sentences for numerous drug-related offenses, arguing the trial court erred by denying his motions to suppress evidence. He contends law enforcement obtained a search warrant based on information gained by unlawfully trespassing into his curtilage and that the search warrant failed to describe his home with sufficient particularity. We vacate the decision of the trial court in part and remand for further proceedings.
Factual and Procedural History
¶ 2 "In reviewing a motion to suppress, we consider only the evidence…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Florida v. JardinesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Kentucky v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- United States v. Osvaldo Rodriguez-MoralesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wiley v. On Point Recovery and Transport LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024