Legal Opinion

Viking Construction Co. v. Town Planning Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 17, 1980PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParskey, J.

In this action of mandamus, the sole issue, which is dispositive of this appeal, is whether, under the provisions of General Statutes § 8-26 (Bev. to 1977), the subdivision application submitted by the plaintiff was approved by operation of law because of lapse of time.

On June 3, 1977, the plaintiff submitted to the defendant town planning commission (hereinafter the commission), on the form prescribed, an application and plans for a small subdivision in Simsbury designated as “Sand Hill Estates.” The application, fee and plans were accepted by the commission’s clerk who thereupon sent the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Finn v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  2. Pluhowsky v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  3. Milford Education Assn. v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Vartuli v. SotireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Harlow v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. Merlo v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Gervasi v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. Koskoff v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API