Legal Opinion

Harlow v. Planning & Zoning Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 7, 1984No. 12268PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

This administrative appeal, like the appeal in Arnold Bernhard & Co. v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 194 Conn. 152, 479 A.2d 801 (1984), decided today, arises out of the enactment of a municipal zoning moratorium. This case turns, however, on two issues not presented in the Bernhard case, the applicability of the moratorium to a site plan application filed *189before the effective date of the moratorium, and the propriety of an order of mandamus to compel zoning commission action on a site plan application.

The plaintiffs, Albert L. Harlow, W. Bradley Morehouse and Walter M. Andrew, Jr., d/b/a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Vartuli v. SotireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Lawrence v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  3. Waterbury Hospital v. Connecticut Health Care AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Finn v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  5. Point O'Woods Assn., Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Spero v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Lauer v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Schwartz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Capalbo v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Essex Leasing, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API