Legal Opinion
Douglas v. Los Angeles Herald-Examiner
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 5, 1975No. Civ. 44424PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LORING, J. *
John Douglas (Douglas) filed a second amended complaint against Los Angeles Herald-Examiner, Division of the Hearst Corporation (Herald) for indemnity and money damages seeking to recover attorney’s fees and costs [under the provisions of Labor Code section 2802] 2 incurred by him in defense of an action filed against him in the United States District Court, Central Division, entitled Leonard L. Bursten (Bursten) v. Allan Dorfman (Dorfman), et al, No. 70-2501-EC which Douglas alleged was filed against him solely because of services rendered by him as a newspaper reporter in…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Janken v. GM Hughes ElectronicsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Platte Anchor Bolt, Inc. v. IHI, INC.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
- Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks Shoppers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Canavin v. Pacific Southwest AirlinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Young v. RedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.