Kincaid v. Detroit Mutual Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
In this case we are asked to determine whether the phrase "weekly compensation rate” in § 352(1)1 of the Workers’ Disability Compensation Act,2 as amended, refers (1) to the amount of weekly compensation payable as the obligation of the employer under §351(1) to a disabled employee, or (2) to the total of such weekly compensation payable by the employer *429plus the amount of "differential” benefits payable weekly by the Second Injury Fund under § 521(2),3 where an employee is totally and permanently disabled. We hold that the phrase refers only to the amount of the employer’s obligation, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Van Dorpel v. Haven-Busch Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Andrejwski v. Wolverine Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
- In Re Petition of State Highway CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
- Lakehead Pipe Line Co. v. DehnMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Maglothin v. TRYCO STEEL CORP.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lulgjuraj v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- Taylor v. Second Injury FundMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Armstrong's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Kincaid v. Detroit Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1988