Legal Opinion

Kincaid v. Detroit Mutual Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1988No. 81128, (Calendar No. 5)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

In this case we are asked to determine whether the phrase "weekly compensation rate” in § 352(1)1 of the Workers’ Disability Compensation Act,2 as amended, refers (1) to the amount of weekly compensation payable as the obligation of the employer under §351(1) to a disabled employee, or (2) to the total of such weekly compensation payable by the employer *429plus the amount of "differential” benefits payable weekly by the Second Injury Fund under § 521(2),3 where an employee is totally and permanently disabled. We hold that the phrase refers only to the amount of the employer’s obligation, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Van Dorpel v. Haven-Busch Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Andrejwski v. Wolverine Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. In Re Petition of State Highway CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Lakehead Pipe Line Co. v. DehnMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Maglothin v. TRYCO STEEL CORP.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lulgjuraj v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Taylor v. Second Injury FundMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Armstrong's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  4. Kincaid v. Detroit Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API