Taylor v. Second Injury Fund
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMarkman, J.
Plaintiff appeals by leave granted from a March 28, 1996, opinion and order of the Worker’s Compensation Appellate Commission (wcac) determining the amount of “differential” benefits plaintiff is entitled to receive from the Second Injury Fund (SIF). We reverse in part and affirm in part.
On May 4, 1988, plaintiff injured his back in the course of his employment with General Motors Corporation (gm). At that time, plaintiff’s average weekly wage, exclusive of fringe benefits, was $843.95. In addition to that cash wage amount, plaintiff also had fringe benefits valued at twenty-five percent of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Franges v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Rittenhouse v. ErhartMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Goff v. Bil-Mar Foods, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Kidd v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Stanley v. Hinchliffe & KennerMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- DiBenedetto v. West Shore HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Michigan Chiropractic Council v. Commissioner of the Office of Financial & Insurance ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Schmaltz v. Troy Metal Concepts, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- DiBenedetto v. West Shore HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- McC v. Commissioner of Office of Financial & Ins. Serv.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004