Armstrong's Case
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.
This appeal from a decision of the Industrial Accident Reviewing Board (board) requires that we consider the relationship between two provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act (act). The two provisions at issue are G. L. c. 152, § 28, which provides for double compensation in cases of “serious and wilful misconduct of an employer,” and G. L. c. 152, § 34B, which provides for a cost of living adjustment to compensation. There is no dispute that the employee, David T. Armstrong (claimant), is entitled to have *797his basic compensation both doubled and supplemented by a cost of living adjustment.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Panasuk's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Bernard v. Cives Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Thayer's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Boardman's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Campbell v. Bates Fabrics, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Percoco's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- CNA Insurance Companies v. SliskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WhitehouseDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1994