Legal Opinion

Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Ward

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 18, 1918No. 3 Div. 277PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court,. Butler County; A. E. Gamble, Judge. Action by Nettie B. Ward against the Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the World. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

[1] There being no bill of exceptions in the record, we can consider only those assignments of error based upon rulings shown by the record proper. On a former appeal it was held that count 1 of the complaint was not subject to the demurrer. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Ward, 196 Ala. 327, 71 South. 404. Since then, counts 2 and 3 have been added to the complaint, to which demurrers were interposed and overruled.

[2] Whether this action of the trial court was erroneous or not, it is unnecessary to determine, since there is nothing in the record to show that, if erroneous, it was prejudicial to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  2. Sovereign Camp W. O. W. v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. J. H. Burton Sons Co. v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Green v. MarlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co v. McCreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. King v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. City of Prichard v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API