Legal Opinion
J. H. Burton Sons Co. v. May
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 22, 1925No. 1 Div. 312PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
There are many assignments of error which will be treated in the order of the arguments thereon.
The overruling of demurrer to count 5 of the complaint is urged as error. It is argued that the count attempts to allege the quo modo of negligence; that the facts alleged • are insufficient; and that it does not allege that damage was the proximate result of the negligence charged.
The necessity and requirements of appropriate pleading are well understood, have often been discussed, and need, not be repeated. Dwight Mfg. Co. v. Holmes, 198 Ala. 590, 73 So. 933, and authorities; B. R., L. & P. Co.…
2Cases cited103 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Atlantic Transport Co. of W. Va. v. ImbrovekSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- The Max MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Alabama Public Service Commission v. Mobile Gas Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Jones v. KeithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Aiken v. McMillanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Batson v. BatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.