Legal Opinion

Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co v. McCree

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 17, 1924No. 6 Div. 954PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The complaint, in two counts, is to recover damages for the value of cotton which defendant is alleged to have insured against loss or injury by fire, and which is alleged to have received damage by fire, within the period fixed in the contract of insurance.

The record shows that "demurrers to defendant's plea inabatement are" sustained, though no such demurrer is shown by the record; the demurrers sustained in the record are to the pleas in bar to the suit. (Italics supplied.) Defendant then pleaded in bar and attempted to set up the failure to furnish proof of loss, as contemplated in the…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Eames v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Best Park & Amusement Co. v. RollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Austin v. BeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  4. Cherokee Life Ins, Co. v. BrannumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  5. Mills v. Merchants' Cotton-Press Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  2. Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co. v. McCreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Barrow v. LindseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. United States Fire Ins. Co. v. HodgesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  5. J. C. Byram & Co. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API