Legal Opinion

In re Dial Complete Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided March 27, 2017No. MDL Case No. 11-md-2263-SMPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*327ORDER

Steven J. McAuliffe, United States District Judge

This consolidated, multi-district class action litigation is brought by consumers in Arkansas, California, Florida, Illinois, Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin, on behalf of themselves and similarly situated consumers in those states, against defendant, The Dial Corporation (“Dial”). Plaintiffs allege that Dial continually misrepresented the antibacterial properties of its “Dial Complete” branded soap, and advance claims under their respective state consumer protection and unfair trade practices statutes, as well as statutory and common law…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re Nexus 6P Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  2. Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  3. Townsend v. Monster Beverage Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2018
  4. Justin Lytle v. Nutramax Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  5. Chapman v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API