Matchett v. Gould
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
ASHBURN, J. pro tem. *
This question is determinative of the instant appeal: Did the trial judge correctly rule that plaintiff’s failure to procure a contractor’s license pursuant to Business and Professions Code, sections 7026, 7028, 7029, precludes his recovery for work, and materials furnished to another contractor under an agreement with that other contractor, who was also unlicensed?
Plaintiff sues as assignee of Prank B. Gotham who conducted business under the name Crane Service Company (herein referred to as Crane). Defendants Jerry Gould and Henry Matthews operate under the name G- & M…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Brooks v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Norwood v. JuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Gatti v. Highland Park Builders, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1946
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Kennoy v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
- Currie v. StolowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Fillmore Products, Inc. v. Western States Paving, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1977
- Harrison v. Butte Steel Buildings, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1957
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.