Legal Opinion

Davis v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 2005No. S-04-861PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.

NATURE OF CASE

The plaintiff, Randy Davis, was injured as a result of an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Goodyear). Davis was able to continue working at Goodyear, but with physical restrictions, and he filed a petition for workers’ compensation benefits. At trial, the parties stipulated to the compensability of the injury and submitted the amount of Davis’ damages to the single judge. The court-appointed vocational rehabilitation specialist had opined that Davis had suffered a 25- to 30-percent loss of earning power if he was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Heiliger v. Walters & Heiliger Electric, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Frauendorfer v. Lindsay Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Sidel v. Travelers InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Foote v. O'Neill PackingNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Harmon v. Irby Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Money v. FlowersNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Armstrong v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Rodriguez v. Hirschbach Motor LinesNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Stacy v. GREAT LAKES AGRI MARKETING, INC.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Picard v. P & C Group 1Nebraska Supreme Court · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API