Legal Opinion

Mann v. Town of Scituate

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 11, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

The only question presented on this bill of exceptions is, whether there was error in excluding the testimony of three witnesses, qualified as experts of the value of land of the petitioner taken by the respondent for a sand and gravel pit under G. L. c. 82, § 38. Neither witness was familiar with real estate values of land in the vicinity of that taken. Neither had bought or sold, nor had owned or informed himself with regard to sales of similar land in the vicinity. Nor did the question put to either contain, as elements to be considered in the opinion desired, reference to sales or real…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sargent v. Inhabitants of MerrimacMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Cornell-Andrews Smelting Co. v. Boston & Providence RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Cochrane v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  4. Conness v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  5. Pierce v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Parker v. LevinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. Tigar v. Mystic River Bridge AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  3. Love v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  4. Guinan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Love v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API