Legal Opinion

Tigar v. Mystic River Bridge Authority

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 1, 1952PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

This is a petition for the assessment of damages under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 79, for the taking of land 1 of the petitioner at 48-50 Second Street, Chelsea. The respondent made the taking for the construction of the bridge authorized by St. 1946, c. 562. The judge found for the petitioner in the amount of $8,900 with interest. The respondent’s exceptions are to the admission in evidence of certain testimony of one Breen, who was called as a witness by the petitioner and qualified as a real estate expert.

The parcel taken was at the corner of Poplar Street, had a frontage on Second Street, and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Epstein v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Assessors of Quincy v. Boston Consolidated Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Moulton v. Newburyport Water Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  4. Smith v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  5. Sargent v. Inhabitants of MerrimacMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Trustees of the Stigmatine Fathers, Inc. v. Secretary of Administration & FinanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Newton Girl Scout Council, Inc. v. Massachusetts Turnpike AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  3. State Road Commission v. FergusonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Boston Gas Co. v. Assessors of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  5. Correia v. New Bedford Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API