Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Guinan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 4, 1929PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an action to recover for personal injuries received by the plaintiff while a passenger on one of the defendant’s cars, which resulted from the same explosion as is considered in Guinan v. Famous Players-Lasky Corp., ante, 501, decided this day. The cases were tried together and the *527jury returned a verdict for the railway company. The case is before us on a report of the trial judge, and presents a single question relating to evidence.

There was evidence that the plaintiff was a passenger on the car; that one Shirley boarded the car at Pleasant Street in Boston, carrying with him a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Commonwealth v. SpencerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Perkins v. StickneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  4. Johnson v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  5. Old Silver Beach Corp. v. Inhabitants of FalmouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BellinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  2. Commonwealth v. SeitMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. CapalboMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. Graustein v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Commonwealth v. DawnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API