Legal Opinion

Conness v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 6, 1904PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Petition, filed September 29, 1900, for the assessment of damages for the taking by the metropolitan park commissioners under St. 1893, c. 407, of two parcels of land in that part of Boston called Dorchester. At the trial in the Superior Court before Bell, J., the jury returned a verdict for the petitioner in the sum of $12,000 with interest from the date of the taking. The respondent alleged exceptions.

1Opinion of the CourtKnowlton, C. J.

The questions in this case relate to the admissibility of the testimony of two witnesses, called by the petitioner as experts to testify in regard to damages to real estate. One of them, so far as appears, had no knowledge of the prices at which land was bought and sold in the vicinity of the land taken by the respondent, and hardly any knowledge of the prices of land in other places. The other testified that he was “ perfectly familiar with values in Dorchester and other places around Boston for manufacturing purposes, but not for any other purposes, and had nothing to do with any other…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SturtivantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  2. Moulton v. Newburyport Water Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  3. Providence & Worcester Railroad v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Maynard v. City of NorthamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  5. Cochrane v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Newton Girl Scout Council, Inc. v. Massachusetts Turnpike AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  3. Assessors of Quincy v. Boston Consolidated Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. Harrington v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  5. Nelson Theatre Co. v. NelsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API