Legal Opinion

Teft v. Booth

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 26, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Butt. Muscogee •county. August 2, 1897.

1Opinion of the CourtFish, J.

1. The plaintiff in error complains because the court below refused to grant the injunction for which he prayed. Upon the face of his petition, irrespective of any evidence in the case, he is not entitled to an injunction. In his original petition he alleges that he is, and has been for some time past, working, in Muscogee county, Ga., for the receivers of the Eagle & Phenix Manufacturing Co., as a day-laborer; that both he and the defendant Moore are citizens of the State of Alabama; that the defendant has sued out process of garnishment, returnable to a justice’s court of Muscogee county,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Banks v. HuntSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  2. Born v. Williams & BrotherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  3. Smith v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  4. Linder v. Benson & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leake v. TynerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. McGinnis v. ScheerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  3. Nash Loan Co. v. YongeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API