Legal Opinion
Charles v. Office of the Armed Forces Medical Examiner
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 27, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2009-0199PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Roger Charles, a retired Marine Corps captain and journalist, brings this action against the Office of the Armed Forces Medical Examiner (“OAFME”), the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (“AFIP”), and the Department of Defense (“DOD”) alleging a violation of the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 706, arising out of Charles’s request for documents related to whether any service member’s deaths may have resulted from bullet wounds in torso areas that…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pub. Citizen Health Research Grp. v. AcostaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Walsh v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Charles v. Office of the Armed Forces Medical ExaminerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Sts Energy Partners Lp v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Eil v. U.S. Drug Enforcement AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.