Legal Opinion

Pub. Citizen Health Research Grp. v. Acosta

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 12, 2018No. Civil Action No. 18-1729 (TJK)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMOTHY J. KELLY, United States District Judge

As part of its effort to improve the collection of work-related injury data, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration ("OSHA"), an agency of the Department of Labor, requires qualifying employers to record work-related injuries and illnesses on a set of standardized forms. Initially, OSHA only occasionally collected these forms from employers, either during on-site inspections or as part of broader industry surveys. But in May 2016, OSHA issued a new rule requiring employers to submit them-three in total-electronically each year. In May…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Am. Acad. Pediatrics v. Food & Drug Admin.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
  2. Rukoro v. Federal Republic of GermanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  3. Children's Health Defense v. National Institutes of HealthDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
  4. Heritage Foundation v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
  5. Nb v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API