State v. O'BRYANT
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Pope, Presiding Judge.
Following a hearing, the trial court granted James D. O’Bryant’s motion to suppress, finding the agents lacked authority to look into O’Bryant’s vehicle which was parked on private premises. The State appeals. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
“A trial court’s decision of questions of fact and credibility at a suppression hearing must be accepted unless clearly erroneous. Santone v. State, 187 Ga. App. 789, 790 (371 SE2d 428).” Garcia v. State, 195 Ga. App. 635, 637 (1) (394 SE2d 542) (1990). With that in mind we consider the evidence.
The evidence presented at the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Santone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Catchings v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Espinoza v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Galloway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- State v. ZackeryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Pickens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Perkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- State v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Cupe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- State v. GayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.