State v. Schwartz
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Presiding Judge.
The State charged Bradley and Elizabeth Schwartz with possession of marijuana with intent to distribute and possession of more than one ounce of marijuana. Before trial, the Schwartzes moved to suppress all evidence seized from their home, including the marijuana. The trial court granted the motion, and the State appeals. For reasons that follow, we affirm.
In reviewing the trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress, we follow three general principles:
First, when a motion to suppress is heard by the trial judge, that judge sits as the trier of facts. The trial judge…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gilreath v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- State v. DavidSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Carranza v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Inglett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. AbleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Leon-Velazquez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Kirsche v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- State v. CharlesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Bowman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.