State v. Gay
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Judge.
The State appeals from the trial court’s grant of Keith Demetrius Gay’s motion to suppress evidence gathered in connection with a warrantless search of his backpack. Gay asserted below that the seizure was unlawful because it was based on a search lacking any legal basis. Having found no error, we affirm.
When reviewing a trial court’s order on a motion to suppress and the facts are not in dispute, we apply a de novo standard of review to the trial court’s application of law to those facts. Vansant v. State, 264 Ga. 319, 320 (1) (443 SE2d 474) (1994). So considered, the testimony…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Watts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Render v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- State v. O'BRYANTCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- State v. KuhnhausenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- State v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Wilder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.