Legal Opinion

Espinoza v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 15, 1995No. S94G1143PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fletcher, Justice.

We granted the writ of certiorari to consider whether the Court of Appeals properly applied the concept of curtilage. We disapprove of the term “common area curtilage,” on which the Court of Appeals relied, and reverse on the ground that police officers discovered the evidence within the curtilage of the defendant’s apartment for which they did not have a search warrant.

A joint city-county narcotics unit obtained a search warrant for the residence of Alejandro Espinoza at 251-B Dickson Road, Marietta, Georgia based on information received from a federal drug enforcement…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Clay v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  2. Linares v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  3. State v. HarnischNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. O'BRYANTCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Bowling v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API