Legal Opinion

Laethem v. Fort Wayne & Belle Isle Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1894PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Submitted on briefs April 6, 1894. Decided May 18, 1894. Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This is an action brought to recover for *299injuries sustained by the alleged negligence of the defendant company.

The defendant operates a single-track street railway with horses in the city of Detroit. The plaintiff, on January 0, 1893, in the morning, was driving his milk sleigh on Champlain street. He stopped his sleigh, and took a can of milk from it into the sleigh of Miss Le Fevre, standing alongside of his. There was a snowdrift near the curb. Miss Le FevreV sleigh stood near the drift, and the plaintiff’s between hers and the railway track. The sleighs were close together, and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rascher v. East Detroit & Grosse Pointe Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Joslin v. Le BaronMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Zeni v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Labarge v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Fritz v. Detroit Citizens' Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. McClellan v. Fort Wayne & Belle Isle Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Merritt v. FooteMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API