Legal Opinion

McCosar v. Chapman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 16, 1916No. 6207PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from District Court, Hughes County; John Caruthers, Judge. Action by Bunnie McCosar and others against James A. Chapman. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

This action involves two allotments of Indian lands, selected in behalf of the heirs of Eliza Mc-Cosar and Ida McCosar, each of whom died unmarried and intestate and without issue, and both survived by their father. Bunnie McCosar. and a sister and brother, all of whom joined as plaintiffs in the court, below, in an action to recover the land and to cancel deeds which they executed therefor. It is charged in the petition:

That the plaintiffs were full-blood Creek Indians, and that Ida McCosar and Eliza McCosar were also full-blood members of that tribe, and that the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sioux Remedy Co. v. CopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Mullen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Skelton v. DillSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Brader v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Rentie v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chupco v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Snell v. CanardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Pluto Oil & Gas Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Seiffert v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Naharkey v. Sand Springs HomeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API