Legal Opinion
Snell v. Canard
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 10, 1923No. 11956PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.
This was an action brought by Sallie Canard against plaintiffs in error to recover certain lands situated in Ok-fuskee county, Okla. The defendants in error Rowe, Phillips and Douglas, filed a petition in • intervention asserting that they were the owners of a one-half interest in said property by reason of an attorney’s contract executed to them by Sallie Canard. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff for the recovery of the lands in controversy and quieting her title thereto, and for rents. Judgment was also entered for the inter-veners in the sum of $2,890 as compensation for their…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pickering v. LomaxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Lykins v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Maharry v. EatmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Barnett v. KunkelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
- Brader v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Thompson's Estate v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Triangle Electric Co. v. FoutchCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Tiger v. LozierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Nellie Atkins Armstrong v. Maple Leaf Apartments, Ltd., a Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- In Re Fulsom's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.