Legal Opinion

Drainage District No. Three v. Riverside Drainage District

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 8, 1919No. 21,912PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No., 1; Richard E. Bird, judge.'

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

In this action drainage district number three of Sedgwick county asks for a mandatory injunction against the Riverside district of the same county, and its directors in their official capacity; and two landowners are also named as defendánts. A demurrer to plaintiff’s petition was sustained, and from that decision plaintiff appeals.

It was alleged that plaintiff was organized as a district on November 16,1915, under chapter 168 of the Laws of 1911, and that prior to that time the officers of the defendant district had changed the course…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mid-West Photo Play Corp. v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  2. City of Emporia v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Kinkel v. ChaseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. Marts v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. School District No. 1 v. NeilSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mullins v. City of El DoradoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. Schulenberg v. City of ReadingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  3. Alber v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. Prickett v. Belvue Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  5. State ex rel. Conly v. Riverside Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API