Legal Opinion
Rex L. Bothell v. Phase Metrics, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 13, 2002No. 01-15474PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LASNIK, District Judge.
Rex Bothell seeks overtime compensation for hours worked in excess of forty per week and other damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and California state law. Appellee Phase Metrics, Inc., argues that Bothell is an exempt “administrative” employee under both federal and state law and is therefore not entitled to overtime payments.
Just before trial, the district court ordered the parties to submit additional briefing in support of their respective positions. After reviewing the submissions, the Court found that Bothell’s…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foti v. City of Menlo ParkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Reich v. John Alden Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Elaine L. Chao, Secretary of Labor v. A-One Medical Services, Inc. Alternative Rehabilitation Home Healthcare, Inc. Lorraine Black and Hanahn KormanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Bell v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Samuel Calderon v. GEICO General Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Cleveland v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Davis v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.