Legal Opinion
Foti v. City of Menlo Park
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 1, 1998No. 97-16061PublishedCited by 313 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:
Rossi Foti (“Foti”) and David Larsen (“Larsen”) regularly picket and leaflet on a public sidewalk in the City of Menlo Park (“City”) in front of a Planned Parenthood facility. They challenge the constitutionality of Menlo Park Ordinance No. 877, which regulates picketing, leafletting, and posting or displaying signs on public property. The district court denied their motion for a preliminary injunction, and this appeal followed. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we reverse in part and affirm in part.
BACKGROUND
Foti and Larsen carry out…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by313 opinions
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Comite De Jornaleros De Redondo Beach v. City of Redondo BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Menotti v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- American Civil Liberties Union v. City of Las VegasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Faustin v. City and CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
308 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.