Legal Opinion

United States v. Jiten Nanda

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 10, 2017No. 16-11135PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDITH BROWN CLEMENT,

Circuit Judge:

Two brothers, Atul and Jiten “Jay” Nan-da (together, “the Nandas”), were indicted, tried jointly by jury, and convicted of various charges stemming from a conspiracy to fraudulently procure H-1B visas. The Nandas jointly appeal their convictions and sentences, raising a number of issues. Because we conclude that the Nandas have not established any reversible error, we AFFIRM their respective convictions and sentences.

I

The Nandas owned and operated Dibon Solutions (“Dibon”), an information technology consulting cornpany based in Texas. Dibon was essentially a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Texas v. CobbSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Earnest Gibson, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. David SpaldingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. David Sanchez, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. GiglioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025
  5. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API