Legal Opinion
California State Employees' Ass'n v. Flournoy
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 9, 1973No. Civ. 40554PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHAUER (Richard), J . *
Petitioners brought the subject class suit for a writ of mandate and declaratory relief on behalf of the faculties and academic employees of the University of California and California State Colleges. The basis .of the suit alleged in petitioners’ “First Amended Petition for Writ of Mandamus” is that the aforementioned academic personnel did not receive salary increases for the fiscal year, 1970-1971. General demurrers 1 of respondents Houston I. Flournoy in his capacity as Controller of the State of California, the Trustees of the California State Colleges and…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Butt v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Mandel v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Weiss v. MarcusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Carmel Valley Fire Protection District v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.